 |
Archive for the ‘Movie News’ Category
Tuesday, June 5th, 2007
There comes a time in every man’s life when he’s sitting at the breakfast table, staring into the vacuous eyes of the animated rabbit on the back of the cereal box in front of him and he thinks “this guy should get his own movie!” Well now, thanks to the magic of warped imagination, here are the five breakfast cereal movies that are most deserving of being snapped into production.
1. Movie: Snap, Crackle and Dead
Characters: Snap, Crackle and Pop
Tagline: Evil has a new face
Plot: World-weary homicide detective Sam Snap and his play-it-by-the-books partner Detective John Crackles are hot on the case of the Pop serial-killer, a deranged ex-mental patient who accidentally kills people in hilariously clutzy ways. Along the way, Snap must struggle with his methodone addiction, pay his ex-wife’s child allowance and deal with his confusing feelings for Crackle.
Oscar Worthy Scene: (After just blowing up a crack whore house run by tyrannical Mexican midgets disguised as nuns and costing the city millions of dollars, the chief forces Snap and Crackle to hand in their badges and guns. But that doesn’t stop them from getting to the bottom of the mysterious spate of hilarious slapstick killings that have been occurring all over the city)
Crackle: Dammit Snap, why won’t you play by the rules? The chief is gonna have my ass for this.
Snap: You know I can’t do that Crackle. Lives are on the line and someone’s gotta pay. I’m gonna get this Pop son-of-a-bitch if I die trying. And Crackle, if I don’t make it outta this, I just wanna say… uhh…
Crackle: I love you too, buddy.
Snap: No, I was gonna say that Rice Krispies aren’t just puffs of air, you know. They actually provide 28% of your recommended daily allowance of calcium and fibre.
Crackle: And they taste a treat too!
Snap: That’s right, Crackle. NOW LET’S NAIL THIS MUTHERFUCKER!
What the critics are saying:
“Snap, Crackle and Dead is an edge of your seat, urine-inducing rollercoaster thrill ride of a movie that is almost as fun to watch as Rice Krispies are fun to eat. And they’re a damn-sight delicious too, providing 28% of your daily recommended daily allowance of calcium and fibre.”
- Back of a Rice Krispies box
“What a piece of shit.”
- New York Times
“Mommy, what’s a crack whore?”
- Timmy, age 5
Posted in CinemATTIC | No Comments »
Tuesday, June 5th, 2007
 
Mike Tyson wants to act in Bollywood movies, according to AP reports. Don't hope for clarification from a Tyson interview in the India Times that sounds like it was run through Google's translation software backwards.
I think I'm supposed to say something snarky here, but, really, when surrealism comes on this fast and hard, additional commentary isn't necessary.
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Tuesday, June 5th, 2007
Filed under: Documentary, Celebrities and Controversy, Newsstand  Wednesday night, a British television channel is going to defy the wishes of Prince William and Prince Harry by showing photographs of Princess Diana's car crash moments after it happened. This is part of a documentary that Channel 4 television will air called Diana: The Witness in the Tunnel. The princes believe the act to be grossly disrespectful and their private secretary, Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton, has said in a note: "If it were your or my mother dying in that tunnel, would we want the scene broadcast to nation?" But this has not deterred the station, and the head of the channel, Julian Bellamy says: "We have weighed the princes' concerns against the legitimate public interest we believe there is in the subject of this documentary and in the still photography it includes." With this reaction, I would imagine that those images must be pretty risque; however, the channel says: "We acknowledge that there is great public sensitivity surrounding pictures of the victims and these have not been included. Some photographs will be of the scene inside the tunnel, but in none of the pictures is it possible to identify Diana or indeed any of the crash victims." Honestly, I'm not sure what these pictures show that have upset the royal offspring so much -- you can find lots of pictures of the car crash online, and even a close-up of Diana surrounded by response teams. So, the royal family could be spot-on in their angered response that Lowther-Pinkerton says will "cause the princes acute distress," or it could be a big kerfuffle for nothing. It might be the latter, since a number of other sources say that there are graphic images of her dying, that her face is just blanked out, etcetera, even though the channel has said none of that will be shown. If you're in the U.K. and see the documentary, let us know if the clips are worth the fuss. Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, cinematical, Movie News | No Comments »
Tuesday, June 5th, 2007
Filed under: Comedy, Universal, Celebrities and Controversy  You might think Judd Apatow's Knocked Up is a pretty "universal" story, right? (And I don't mean just the production company.) A booze-fueled one-night stand leads to an unexpected pregnancy, which in turn leads to an uncomfortable courtship and ultimately ... love. Pretty basic, right? Conventional even? Don't tell that to author Rebecca Eckler, because she's about to sue Mr. Apatow and Universal Pictures for stealing her story without credit, consultation or financial renumeration. Aside from the basic similarities (which were first mentioned in the comments section of Erik's review), both the movie and the book share the same title. In the movie, the main female character is an aspiring television entertainment reporter; in the book she is an aspiring newspaper reporter. Both the film and the book also feature a "Jewish Dad" character. The similarities seem to end there, according to CBC Canada, but unfortunately it looks like Ms. Eckler definitely has a case here. How fortunate for her that she waited until the flick's $30 million opening weekend before expressing any concerns.* Anyone out there read Knocked Up? Is this just a collision of common tales and coincidence? Or do we actually believe that Universal / Apatow knew all about the book and blatantly cribbed from it anyway? Seems like a pretty short-sighted thing to do, if you ask me. My guess is that a quick little out-of-court settlement is on the horizon. * UPDATE: One commenter informs us that Ms. Eckler has indeed been writing about this situation in Macleans Magazine. Read her side right here. Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie News | No Comments »
Tuesday, June 5th, 2007
Now in his third adventure, the beloved green ogre who yearns for his filthy swamp and despises fairy-tale figures seems slightly fatigued, missing many occasions to generate what made its two predecessors so refreshing and hilarious. (more…)
Posted in Movie News, Reviews | No Comments »
Monday, June 4th, 2007
Ong Bak is one of my favorite martial arts movies. Although Tony Jaa was the film’s main attraction, the story was pretty decent as well, and so was the direction. Fight choreography can make or break a martial arts movie, and in the case of Ong Bak it was simply spectacular. Honour of the Dragon (Tom yum goong) was made by the same team and also features Tony Jaa. Too bad its not quite as good.
(more…)
Posted in Movie News, Reviews | No Comments »
Monday, June 4th, 2007
What happens when a studio puts all its energy into a monster opening weekend without the bother of a good movie to back it up? Right: It falls off a cliff. "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" dropped 62% from its opening-weekend grosses, similar to the fate that befell "Spider-Man 3" a few weeks earlier. "Pirates" was still the No. 1 movie in the country with $43.2 million, but, truly, most of us had already moved on to the next glittering diversion.
Which would be "Knocked Up"? Sort of. Buoyed by reviews of glue-sniffing delirium and expectations of another "40-Year-Old Virgin," the movie pulled in $29.3 million, a good increase over "Virgin"'s $21 million two years ago. Still, that R-rating has to have made a dent and the movie's cheerful but unabashed raunch will keep it from going mom-and-pop broad. (It's fun to scroll through the user comments for the film over at IMDB and guess which posters are under or above the age of 35.) It's worth noting that the per-theater-average for "Knocked Up" ($10,199) beat the PTA for "Pirates" ($9,900), and that the Judd Apatow comedy cost $30 million to make versus $200+ million for the third swashbuckler. That means Disney will keep "Pirates" in theaters until next March to cover their investment.
The Kevin Costner serial killer movie "Mr. Brooks" opened with a mild wheeze: $10 million. The Shue family soccer flick "Gracie" sank without a trace: $1.4 million.
Some interesting numbers in arthouse land, though: Irish musical "Once" is up to 60 theaters and is still making an average $7,500 per, quite strong for a lovely little bit of low-budget perfection. Period immigrant saga "Golden Door" made an average $11,000 at each of the three theaters it played at. (Wesley saw it last week and is kvelling mightily; it opens here a week from Friday.) And Russian sci-fi sequel "Day Watch" ($9,260 PTA) and Japanese anime blow-out "Paprika" ($7,412 PTA) are playing nicely to their respective niches.
Further BO info at Box Office Mojo and Leonard Klady.
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Monday, June 4th, 2007
Filed under: Horror, Celebrities and Controversy, Politics, Remakes and Sequels Before I present you with the situation, here's a question to think about: Is it okay for someone to label Hostel: Part II "disgusting" prior to seeing the film? Think about that; we'll get back to it. The always-opinionated Nikki Finke recently wrote a story for her Deadline Hollywood site which talked about the various bootleg copies of Hostel: Part II that are showing up on streets and online. Now, in reporting on this story, Finke said the following: "I say, fine: Lionsgate deserves to feel the effects of piracy (not to mention the wrath of mankind) for distributing such a disgusting film." It's her belief that no business should profit off the "uber-violence" apparently featured in the Hostel sequel.
Okay, everyone has the right to their opinion -- except, when you dish it, you need to be able to handle whatever backfire heads your way. Case in point: Brendon from Film ick wasn't happy about how Finke called Hostel: Part II "disgusting" when she hadn't even seen the film yet. During an odd back-and-forth between Brendon and Finke (in which all of Finke's emails were subsequently removed and summarized at her request), it appears Brendon's biggest problem is that Finke "a) declared a film 'disgusting' and insinuated it is without merit, without even seeing it first, and b) attempted to prejudice other people similarly." Finke, on the other hand, felt she had every right to "be offended by 'torture porn'" and shouldn't be persecuted for urging people not to watch the film. Following that exchange, it appears emails were blocked, filtered into spam folders and the call went out for readers to send Finke an email telling her why she's wrong.
In defense of Finke, calling Hostel: Part II "disgusting" (which, in all reality, it probably is -- and even director Eli Roth wouldn't disagree with you there) is no different than assuming the latest Lindsay Lohan film sucks because she's in it. I'm not saying it's right to assume things, but those of us in the movie blog business do it all the time. It's our job to assume; we get paid to offer an opinion. And so it goes. Should Finke have re-worded it to read, "Hostel: Part II is probably disgusting," just as Brendon said Prince of Persia "sounds like quite a dreadfully dull film?" Probably. Then again, Finke urging people not to see it will probably help the film more than it hurts -- "Finke said not to go. I'm there!" What do you think? Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, cinematical, Movie News | No Comments »
Monday, June 4th, 2007
Filed under: Action & Adventure, Celebrities and Controversy, Movie Marketing  This is one that you probably won't hear about from the traditional conspiracy theorists like Art Bell, but it exists nonetheless. It also has the potential to become bigger (pun intended) as this insidious plan works its way across the globe, ensnaring many unsuspecting actresses, movie executives, theater patrons, and checkout-stand magazine covers in its tentacles. 10 Zen Monkeys is reporting that they've noticed something interesting: a lot of quotes from actresses in the top summer blockbusters about their breasts. They also did a little sleuthing to determine what was all behind it, and their conclusion was that these stars seem to think that talking about their chests will improve the box office takes of the summer tentpole films. They call out Keira Knightley ( Pirates of the Caribbean 3), Kirsten Dunst ( Spiderman 3), Cameron Diaz ( Shrek 3), Jessica Alba ( The Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer) and Lindsay Lohan (arguably not in a summer blockbuster ... especially after Georgia Rule sort of tanked). The ladies have backed themselves into a corner with no way to unhook themselves. We'll have to see how things stack up after the summer box office receipts are in. Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie News | No Comments »
Sunday, June 3rd, 2007
Games such as Super Paper Mario are all you need to justify buying a Wii. This is a true system seller, reassuring players that while Nintendo will milk Mario with disasters like Mario Hoops on the DS, there's always a way to bring him back. This is a game just shy of perfection.
After an overly lengthy text-based introduction, you'll soon forget that time waster as you run through a 2-D Mario creation, stomping on Goombas and hitting blocks for coins. With a sharp, clean graphical presentation, this superb throwback level immediately involves the player from the first time they begin moving the classic plumber.
There's depth here though, and that's to be taken literally. Mario can switch at anytime into a 3-D view of the level, radically altering the mechanics and leading to some of the most ingenious puzzles Nintendo has ever dreamt up. Since the switch always occurs directly behind Mario, there are no camera problems and the enhanced shadow keeps players on the right plane when trying to knock out an enemy.
The Wii Remote is held sideways, as it would be when playing some Virtual Console games. Actual uses of the motion sensing controls are relatively weak, such as pointing at the screen to reveal hidden object or to complete a series of motions to use a power-up. Still, while by no means revolutionary (they could have been handled by any controller), required uses of these moves opens up another avenue of exploration when trying to solve Paper Mario's levels.
During the quest, additional characters become available. Some are directly controlled (such as Princess Peach), and others are Pixls, creatures that grant the lead character a special skill. Swapping between these is the game's most significant hindrance. There's no option to swap between characters without digging into the menu system, stopping the game entirely while you make changes. Worse, the flipping into 3-D view is a Mario exclusive making the swaps more apparent.
It's definitely something you can grow used to over time. You'll be far too involved in the fun mechanics to notice the majority of the time regardless. Nintendo has managed a few basic concepts, kept the simplicity new players will appreciate intact, and still avoided feelings of repetition. Puzzles are crafted in a way that each one feels unique, even when at their core they're the same as the last one.
The game's story is riddled with comedy, and loads of references to the company's past. Boss fights always bring something different to the table, both in terms of advancing the story and their means of defeat. Some struggles can take an entire level to clear.
Paper Mario will surely be on "best of" lists when 2007 winds down. There's an exhaustive amount of content to find, explore, and play through contained on this disc. This is the best title in the Mario RPG/Paper Mario line by far.
Super Paper Mario is rated E (Everyone) by the ESRB for Comic Mischief and Mild Violence.

 Matt Paprocki is the reviews editor for Digital Press, a classic video game website which he called home after his fanzine (Gaming Source) published its final issue. The deep game collection which spans nearly 30 systems and 2,000 games line his walls for reasearch purposes. Really. He has also begun writing freelance for the Toledo Free Press.

Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
|
|
|