 |
Archive for the ‘Movie News’ Category
Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008

Michael Cieply revealed yesterday in the New York Times that the membership process to join the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, that group that hands out the Oscars, is mysterious. This shouldn't be a surprise, but the changes in entry rules now mean a nomination is no longer grounds for membership, either. Best actress nominee Ellen Page, it was revealed, is not a member. Weird. Weirder is how a producer didn't make the cut but his equally accomplished partner did. (I'm sure the story will embarrass someone into admitting these and other people, like Seth Rogen who was also named. Don't they want the youth vote rallying behind cooler people and movies?)
The upside of all this is that, increasingly, the membership is starting to look a lot like the world and not simply like Hollywood. (Or maybe it just confirms once again that Hollywood is still the world.) It also might mean the nominated films, technicians, and actors will continue to be less popular and more interesting - not that those two things are mutually exclusive. So it's reasonable to expect more nominees like Adriana Barraza and Rinko Kikuchi from "Babel." How much this really changes the game, though, is still anybody's guess. I mean, while Three 6 Mafia are impressive Oscar winners (it's not hard out here for a pimp anymore), Alfonso Cuaron doesn't have one. Just saying.
The most enlightening thing about this peek behind the Academy's curtain is that we now know the process for entry is as arbitrary as the nomination system can be.
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Monday, December 1st, 2008
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy, Lists  The end of the year means you'll have no shortage of movie lists to pick through ... but here's one that's just too bouncy to ignore. My old pals at MrSkin.com have (of course) come up with their list of the finest in cinematical skinematical for the year 2008. Now, before you get all huffy and stressed, it should be noted that MrSkin has always taken a rather jovial approach to movie-time nakedness. (Jovial as opposed to sleazy, is what I'm saying.) Plus, c'mon, we all love a good nude scene. Admit it. Love it enough to give MrSkin a whole lot of longtime fans. (Heck, they even played a prominent role in Knocked Up!) But if you're scared of seeing copious cleavage or perhaps a stray butt-dimple, here's a text-based sampling of what you'll be missing: The stunning Sophie Monk in the amusing Sex & Death 101; the spunky Amy Smart re-defining "jaw-dropping" in Mirrors; plus just a few sexy peeks at Penelope Cruz, Mena Suvari, Amy Adams, and Angelina Jolie. Wanted, indeed. For a whole lot more (and a lot less clothes), check out the piece(s). And hey, there's another twenty for you TV fans. Since when is there nudity on TV? Check out the 20 film girls, in order of where they appear on the list, in the gallery below. P.S. This is a list of female nakedness. For the other side of the equation, I challenge the women writers (and readers) of Cinematical to kick-start that roster. Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Monday, December 1st, 2008
Filed under: RumorMonger, Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Newsstand, Remakes and Sequels .jpg) You'd think there wouldn't be a ton of stuff to catch you post-Turkey blokes up with, but it's the exact opposite. So here's some stuff(ing) and things to skim over today: -- Folks are going bonkers today over news in Production Weekly that the much-anticipated (and kinda secretive) Tron sequel has changed its title to TRZ in order to trick young kids into thinking MTV has adapted their now-retired TRL for the big screen. Okay, that's not the real reason ... but do we really need to know the real reason? TRZ? Here's the snippet of plot synopsis they provided: "After being transported into the surreal landscape of a mainframe computer to destroy an intruder, a programmer finds himself allied with the leader of a rebellion against a corrupt cyber-entity." According to Disney, an official title for the Tron sequel is not set yet. -- George Miller finally went on the record and told a talk show in Sydney that he's officially off Justice League. He's done. That's it. Over. Dark Horizons says Miller thinks the film will be recast when (and if) it happens because "the studios seem to want bigger stars in their superhero movies now." We wonder why? -- According to Shock, a source tells them Rob Zombie will indeed return to direct Halloween 2, the follow-up to his successful (at the box office) reboot of the franchise, titled Halloween. Additionally, the site claims Halloween 2 will begin shooting as early as this March. -- Why do all the Nazi flicks come out during the holidays? And how do you sell them? -- Jennifer Hudson's estranged brother-in-law has been arrested for the deaths of the actress/singer's mother, brother and nephew, according to CBS News. After the jump: First looks at Whip It and Youth in Revolt, more on Chef and a very cool short film contest.Continue reading Stuff and Things: Some Post-Turkey 'Tron' Sequel Hatin' Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Monday, December 1st, 2008
Filed under: Classics, Celebrities and Controversy  It's a thorny dilemma, both legally and morally -- fittingly, the kind of story that, were it turned into a movie, might win a couple Oscars itself. The question is this: Does the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences have the legal right to buy back an Oscar winner's statuette if he or she (or his or her heirs) decides to get rid of it? What if the Oscar winner wants to sell it at auction and donate the money to charity? Can the Academy in good conscience demand return of the statuette and deprive the charity of those funds? See? Thorny! For Academy Award winners since 1950, the legalities are fairly uncomplicated. The minute you win the sucker, you have to sign a contract saying that if you or your heirs ever decide you don't want the trophy anymore, the Academy has the right to buy it back for $10. That's the Academy's way of preventing the devaluation of the statuette. If any old schmo with a few hundred thousand dollars could "win" an Oscar at Jack Nicholson's garage sale, the prize would lose all meaning. As it is, of course, winning an Oscar is the single greatest achievement that a human being can ever hope to accomplish -- and the Academy wants to keep it that way. The issue that's about to go before a Los Angeles judge and jury is what should happen to the best actress Oscar that Mary Pickford won for 1929's Coquette. (That's Pickford and the troublesome trophy in the picture.) The Academy didn't have the first-dibs rule back then -- but when Pickford won an honorary Oscar in 1976, she signed the agreement, and the Academy says that contract was retroactive to include her earlier trophy, too. Continue reading Who Owns Mary Pickford's Oscar? Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Monday, December 1st, 2008

Best scene in the movie, don't you think?
In the same way that some people rush to put up their Christmas decorations before the Thanksgiving turkey's even digested or trample Walmart personnel to death in a Black Friday shopping frenzy, audiences turned out en masse to see "Four Christmases," an unpleasant little family fable featuring the likable but freakishly mismatched Reese Witherspoon and Vince Vaughn. The movie made an estimated $46 million from its Wednesday opening to Sunday evening, $31 million of that during the weekend proper. Presumably some in the audience were fleeing their own families; how's that for perverse?
The big disappointment, by contrast, was "Australia," Baz Luhrmann's $130 million epic: debuting in over 2,500 theaters, it pulled in a spare estimated $20 million, $14 million of it over the weekend, for a fifth-place showing. Tepid reviews may have been a factor, but the film's length may have had more to do with it; that and stars who aren't quite big enough to make a movie must-see on their own. The film opened the same day in Australia and grossed $5 million there, an unqualified hit by that country's terms.
Disney's strategy with "Bolt" -- take the lumps from "Twilight" during the first week and wait for family audiences to come out after Thanksgiving -- appears to have paid off nicely. The 3D animated film actually saw its second-weekend grosses show improvement rather than the standard nosedive, putting it just above "Twilight" in second place for the period. (The teen vampire flick has grossed $120 million overall, almost twice that of "Bolt.")
Two limited-release movies that are attracting huge audiences: "Milk," which debuted on 36 screens and averaged a monster $38,000 per theater on the strength of great reviews and Oscar buzz for Sean Penn, and "Slumdog Millionaire," which expanded to 49 screens in its third week and is still raking in a $28,000 per-theater-average. That, my friends, is word of mouth.
More BO numbers from Box Office Mojo and Leonard Klady at Movie City News.
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Saturday, November 29th, 2008
According to the backstory of how Hell Ride got made, it was a meeting between Quentin Tarintino and Larry Bishop, who played a batrender in Kill Bill v2, and was best known as a cult film star of several road and exploitation biker films from the late 1960’s and early 70’s. “It is your destiny to write, direct and star in a movie” Quentin is quoted as saying to Bishop. The Pulp Fiction director would also put his name on it as an executive producer. Actually, Tarintino should have considered taking his name off the film, unless he was simply giddy that his name is connected to a exploitation biker pic for the next generation. It doesn’t work. Hell Ride is indeed an accurate title- the ride is hell, that’s undisputed. (more…)
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Friday, November 28th, 2008
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Casting, RumorMonger, Celebrities and Controversy, Newsstand, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels
Poor Hulk! Batman, Iron Man, even Wolverine get more sequel press than he does. But late last week, Tim Blake Nelson revealed to MTV that he had signed for Hulk sequels, with every intention of taking the villainous center stage as The Leader. But like the rest of us, he has no idea whether or not they'll come to be, or whether or not Edward Norton will return. "It's all good, and I really do hope [the sequel] happens, for all sorts of reasons. But yeah, we did, we had a great time on Hulk together. I'm eager to do Hulk 2 if they make it ... I'm signed on to do Hulk 2 and 3 whether Edward's there or not, so it's not even up to me ... I certainly hope Edward is on the sequel - but that's up to Marvel and Edward." Meanwhile, over in Avengers land, Robert Downey Jr. mentioned again that Hulk is going to show up in that crown jewel of superhero flicks. It's a strange place for the green giant to be in, because he's going forward, yet lost in a land of sequel rumor and leading man drama. It's a question we've thrown out to Cinematical readers before, but with all this additional info, where do you want Hulk to go from here? Do you think that he should get his planned trilogy, then land with a thunderclap in The Avengers? Should they just leave well enough alone with The Incredible Hulk? And how do you feel about yet another Hulk recast? My personal take is that if Marvel can't make up with Norton, they should just give up franchising Hulk, and just leave him off the big screen until The Avengers. Theoretically, you could have an all-CGI Hulk in that, thereby sidestepping the need to replace Norton. It would be clunky, though, and might "really really suck." Sigh. Why does there have to be so much drama in the world of Marvel? Earth's mightiest heroes should have a much easier time uniting than this.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Wednesday, November 26th, 2008
Filed under: Classics, Drama, Foreign Language, Romance, Celebrities and Controversy  Toss this one right into the "unproven" files, but it's amusing enough to warrant some exploration: According to this tabloid (along with The Guardian and our pals at Spout), it seems that spouses Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes may be gearing up to remake Bernardo Bertolucci's controversially sexy romance drama Last Tango in Paris. The last time we saw Tom Cruise nail a spouse on camera was in 1999's Eyes Wide Shut, and I'm sure he probably groped Mimi Rogers in a movie once or twice. (Say what you like, but the guy does have good taste in women.) "They need to have sex on screen, to prove their love" is what The Guardian's Xan Brooks had to say, which only serves to make the whole thing sound more like an April Fool's gag. The paragon of journalism that is Now Magazine indicates that the couple simply wants to star together in something sexy. I believe the title Basic Instinct was tossed out as an example. Yikes. In Mr. Brooks' tongue-in-cheek piece, he proposes a remake of Betty Blue. Double yikes. But if this entirely goofball story turns out to be 100% true, and Cruise / Holmes are intent on making a "sek-say" remake together ... Lolita makes a little more sense. Or maybe The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Seriously, that I'd go see. But the question of the day is now this: Does it creep you out to see married couples "doin' it" in a movie? Hmmm, I think I smell a new Cinematical Seven topic. Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Saturday, November 22nd, 2008
There were a few fears I had going into the sequel to Step Up, a surprise dance hit from two years ago. Both fears were confirmed within the sequel’s first ten minutes. Despite being entertaining and energetic, the first film had lots of clunky dialog and unbelievable soap opera circumstances. The sequel is made from the same mold, and, no pun intended, really does get off on the wrong foot, at least in the first reel. It takes some time for the film to recover, the lifeline supplied by the dancing and one character who is played by Adam G. Sevani, who I had never seen before, but who steals scenes left and right from everyone else in the entire film. When his character gets interesting? They have him literally step aside. (more…)
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Saturday, November 22nd, 2008
This is one picture that has three things going for it from start to finish: Jackie Chan, Jet Li and a ton of fun. The Forbidden Kingdom, of course, was the highly anticipated film that featured the martial arts legends in the same film at the same time. On that level, it does not disappoint. It’s only a let down in my view because there should have been more story-the film almost begs to be more epic on a grander scale and palette. (more…)
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
|
|
|