 |
Archive for the ‘Movie News’ Category
Wednesday, December 5th, 2007
Filed under: Thrillers, Celebrities and Controversy, Newsstand  He wasn't born yesterday, and he's certainly not a newbie to the business, but you might start wondering about Will Smith with this latest piece of news. Reuters/Moviefone report that the popular actor made one heck of a flub on Tuesday in Tokyo -- one that "had the producer of his latest film [ I Am Legend] holding his head in anguish." During a news conference in the foreign city, "Smith inadvertently revealed the plot, prompting co-producer and co-screenwriter Akiva Goldsman to shout: 'Don't give away the ending!'" The report goes on to state that Goldman pretended to be surprised, although I'm not sure why he'd have to pretend -- a slip like that is entirely surprising. So, the press were asked to keep the ending a secret, in hopes that it wouldn't get out and spoil the film for viewers. Now let's recap some of Smith's big movies -- Independence Day, Men in Black, I, Robot... And these are only some of them. What on earth led the man to spoil a movie that relies on the anticipation of mystery? He hasn't been working wildly, and if Peter O'Toole can handle tons of roles, I'm sure Smith can handle his nicely-paced, steady work. Is he suffering from a lack of sleep? Maybe his people should send him to his room for a nice, long nap before those people who made the spoiler shirt find him! But this also reminds me of other famous loose-lipped plot revealers -- those people who throw out the twists and endings of films either with reckless stupidity, or malicious jerkiness. Personally, I'm thinking of Rosie O'Donnell telling everyone about the twist in Fight Club. What slips do you remember? Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie News | No Comments »
Tuesday, December 4th, 2007
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy, 20th Century Fox  Okay, how many people from Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan have not sued the production? By now, I would assume that at least half of these guys have, and even though it has been over a year since the flick has screened to audiences, disgruntled, unknowing participants are still rolling in. Reuters reports that the latest guy to complain is driving instructor Michael Psenicska. Remember the scene? According to his lawsuit, he was fooled into thinking that he was part of a "documentary about the integration of foreign people into the American way of life." He names star Sacha Baron Cohen, One America Productions, Todd Lewis, and Twentieth Century Fox in the claim. The instructor says he got $500 in cash for the lesson, and says that it was all "surreal," as Cohen drove erratically, drank, and propositioned a pedestrian for sexy time. In addition to that cash, he's asked for $400,000 in the suit, for damages and his continual emotional harm. Oh, how I love the emotions angle, especially when it's coming from a gruff guy who was freaked out by Borat's kiss greeting. I guess the thought of hundreds of thousands of dollars was enough to make him get in touch with his softer side. Can you imagine how much worse he'd be handling things if he was part of some of the other scenes? The lesson to be learned in all of this: Don't agree to any sort of media involvement if there's even the slightest possibility that you wouldn't like their spin on things. Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie News | No Comments »
Tuesday, December 4th, 2007

Saw "There Will Be Blood" yesterday, on day 1 of what we refer to in-house as the Oscar-movie death march (Coppola's "Youth Without Youth" today at 2, "Charlie Wilson's War" at 7, "Sweeney Todd" tomorrow. Etc.)
Anyway, "Blood." The return of Paul ("Boogie Nights") Thomas ("Magnolia") Anderson ("Punch-Drunk Love"). The return of Daniel Day-Lewis and the second coming of Paul Dano (the mute kid from "Little Miss Sunshine") as, respectively, Capitalism and Old-Time Religion battling it out for the American soul in the early days of the 20th century. Very weird, very funny, very scary, and I wasn't sure I liked it until I couldn't get it out of my head all night.
Wesley's assigned to review this when it gets released at the end of December, and I don't want to steal his thunder. A few observations, then, rather than a full-on early take. Day-Lewis owns this movie, which makes sense, since it's an epic two and a half hour character sketch rather than a thickly plotted narrative. The performance has pieces of every self-made American monster who has walked through our movie imagination, from Charles Foster Kane to John Huston's Noah Cross in "Chinatown." (Day-Lewis' Daniel Plainview even sounds like Huston.) "Blood" is a radical stylistic shift for Anderson, brooding and monomaniacal where his previous films were mannered and impassioned. The dialogue is cryptic but beautiful; the subject heading above comes from a climactic scene and is nearly operatic in its lunacy. (It even makes sense in context.) The source material, Upton Sinclair's "Oil!," seems to have been mined for its characters alone, as though Anderson had ripped them out of the book and set them walking , to see where they'd go.
I can't wait to see it again.
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Tuesday, December 4th, 2007
Filed under: Horror, Celebrities and Controversy, Movie Marketing, Best/Worst
Lame because: The "torture porn" boom-that-wasn't didn't fill 2007 with dull movie series (Hostel II, Saw IV) and lame attempts to cash in (Captivity, Turistas) that uniformly failed to deliver at the box office; it also led to even more tedious op-ed pieces and blog posts decrying the trend as yet another sign of the decline of civilization or defending it as a form of expression. I sincerely don't know which is worse; Eli Roth's inability to make a real movie, or people complaining about the movies he makes so badly. (Asked about where you can go as a direction for future artistic exploration with 'torture porn' by The New York Times, Roth's witty rejoinder was ""They say there is more than one way to skin a cat. Well, there are many ways to skin a human." Congratulations, Mr. Roth, but is it just the one trick that your pony does?) Another tedious element of talking about "torture porn" is that it reframes talking about horror films as good vs. evil, as opposed the way a reasonable person would go about framing the discussion, which is as good vs. bad. Anyone who thinks excessive violence is a modern trend in pop culture is invited to flip open a copy of Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus or some of the more choice bits of the Old Testament; the high-pitched whine about 'torture porn' that came at us in stereo from the restrictive right and liberal left in 2007 is yet another droning tone in the mass-media chorus that drowns out any attempt to talk about the realities behind violence in this country -- underfunded policing and public psychiatric care, guns in the hands of people who shouldn't have them, the failure of individual responsibility. It's easier to talk about violent movies as a cause of violence than it is to tackle any of the things that actually cause violence but, really, when High School Musical was at the top of the charts, did you see a lot of singing and dancing in the streets?
How to turn it around: The better question is, why would you want to? Hopefully, studios will look at the dwindling return-on-investment these films represent (even if Lionsgate is threatening to run the Saw series into the ground) and realize that, hey, audiences might be interested in horror films that scare instead of disgust (The Orphanage) or are made by actual talents (the upcoming Funny Games) as opposed to hacks who only know where to get a bulk rate on fake blood and plastic sheeting.
|
Next up: Stop being greedy!  |
Where did they rank?
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie News | No Comments »
Tuesday, December 4th, 2007
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy, Lists  The current issue of Entertainment Weekly features a cover story on "The 50 Smartest People in Hollywood." Last week, Monika commented on that list, stating that it's not as fun reading about smarties as it is reading about the dummies. Well, in response to EW, New York's Daily News ran its own list of the "Top 50 Dumbest People in Hollywood." Not surprisingly, sitting in the number one spot is Lindsay Lohan. An obvious choice since she's been the subject of more bad decisions -- at least that the media has concentrated on -- than any other celeb out there. Well, maybe Britney Spears (shockingly far down at #14) has made more. But Lohan has also made bad career decisions in addition to her bad personal-life decisions. Go ahead and sift through Cinematical's coverage of Lohan throughout the past year or two; I challenge you to find one smart idea she's had (entering rehab doesn't count). Since this is a tabloid, though, the Daily News' list is hardly about career smarts. Most of the people on the list are there because of their scandals, controversies and apparently unforgivable, ongoing problems. That is how Shia LaBeouf -- who should be on EW's list more than Ben Affleck should -- can be considered dumb, despite the fact that his public drunkenness arrest has hardly dented his career. Same goes for Russell Crowe, whose phone-throwing incident was more than two years ago. Other celebs are easily agreed with: former Oscar hopeful Courtney Love; almost-threw-it-all-away-at-the-beginning actress Vanessa Hudgens; K-Fed (only #38?). Check out the rest here. [ via Fark.com] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie News | No Comments »
Monday, December 3rd, 2007
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy, Cinematical Indie  In a recent article for Cinematical, I wrote: "Too often, Asian-American actors are relegated to bit parts (the food delivery guy, gangster #3, mysterious prostitute) simply because of their race." Historically, there's another reason why Asian-American actors have not been cast in leading roles, even when the role is that of an Asian or Asian-American character: the "yellow face" factor, in which a non-Asian actor is cast as an Asian. Playwright/actor David Henry Hwang has written a play with that title, which was inspired by the controversy that arose in the early 1990s when non-Asian actor Jonathan Pryce was cast as a Eurasian character in the original stage production of Miss Saigon. (Hwang's play opens shortly off-Broadway in New York.) Robert B. Ito wrote a biting article on the subject in Bright Lights Film Journal that gave historical context. Philip W. Chung commented on the phenomenon last week in AsianWeek: "Often, these 'yellow face' performances [by non-Asian actors] both reinforced and embodied all the negative stereotypes -- funny accent, slanted eyes, buck teeth, and enough 'Orientalism' to send the yellow fever meter through the roof." Chung compiled a list of 25 "yellow face" film performances "that have arguably had the most impact on our cultural landscape." Last week's article counted down from #25 to #11. Chung starts off his list with a recent example -- Christopher Walken in Balls of Fury -- and then stretches back to Richard Barthelmess in D. W. Griffith's Broken Blossoms (1919), which he says formed a "template for Hollywood's take on Asian men ... unrealistically noble, feminine and utterly asexual." Chung takes a fascinating skip through the decades and points out "yellow face" performances by Fisher Stevens (#20), Eddie Murphy (#18) and Peter Lorre (#13). AsianWeek's Top 10 will be counted down this week. Who do you think should be included on the list? Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie News | No Comments »
Monday, December 3rd, 2007
Filed under: Comedy, Romance, Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Newsstand, Fan Rant Though she co-starred in one of the biggest (and most enjoyable) films of the year -- in a role that catapulted her from that chick on Grey's Anatomy to mega movie star -- Katherine Heigl has decided to turn around and take a giant dump on the film that "made" her. In a new interview with Vanity Fair (via Us Magazine), the actress called Knocked Up "a little sexist" and adds: "It paints women as shrews, as humorless and uptight, and it paints the men as goofy, fun-loving guys. It was hard for me to love the movie." And your point is? First up, has Heigl ever watched a romantic comedy before? Doesn't she know that not all the characters can play freaks and geeks -- that some have to play it straight in order to up the conflict, the tension and the comedy? And what's wrong with being goofy and fun-loving? Isn't that the whole point of the film -- that Heigl plays a career gal on her way to a great promotion when she gets "knocked up" by a moron?
Seriously now, if she wants to go that route, then Rogen and Rudd could easily comment and say the film portrays all men as morons; as guys who don't want to commit, who hate their lives and who have no clear goals at all. If anything, Heigl and Leslie Mann are the most level-headed out of the whole lot. I don't see that as being "uptight," I see that as being stressed out that you just received a promotion only to find out that your idiotic one-night-stand knocked you up. I mean, what was her character supposed to do in that situation? Smoke a joint and play Nintendo? Reality check for Heigl: Guys obsess over sex. The website they wanted to create is a real website that exists in the real world. These characters were based, in some ways, on real people. I hate it when these actors and actresses trash a film they were in without saying what they would've done to correct the situation. Katherine Heigl thinks Knocked Up was sexist? Well I think 27 Dresses looks like absolute sh*t. Prove me wrong. Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie News | No Comments »
Sunday, December 2nd, 2007

... at that Friends of Film screening of "Atonement" (it opens Friday): I know it wasn't the greatest movie you've ever seen (the refinement, the "shocking" vulgarity, the cheekbones). But was it necessary to express your disdain (you were being disdainful, right?) by whipping out your emory board and proceeding to file your nails? Never mind that I usually do that over the sink in my bathroom or on a lonely walk in the park, but your session lasted for three scenes. I know because the sawing was all I could think about, and at such a majorish moment, too: your manicure began during a death scene.
It's true that was a dull scene, but not the one after it, in the hospital. Remember? Oh, that's right: saw, saw, saw. How many talons do you have, anyway? No one needs a three-scene filing. Yes, agreed: the cell phone that went off three times was annoying. But how does that excuse you? And why am I the only Friend of Film who turned around to shoot you a nasty look? (Friends just don't let friends file their nails.) Why did I have to do it four useless times? Your husband didn't bat at an eyelash. (What a champ.) Neither did the couple you made a big deal of holding seats for. You didn't ruin the movie for me. For the most part, the movie did that all by itself. But that sort of public hygiene might be a moviegoing nadir. And for that, madame, you should atone.
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Sunday, December 2nd, 2007
The Goonies is a classic adventure tale that follows a group of young friends as they embark on a treasure hunt to find legendary pirate - ‘One Eyed Willy’s’ hoard. These kids are not your average adventurers though. The group include an asthmatic, a crazy inventor, a cheerleader, a mouthy prankster, and a fat compulsive liar, and none of them are exactly fearless. They scream and jump at pretty much anything they come across, from old skeletons to numerous booby traps. The amount of energy the young actors have makes each scene pretty intense and exciting to watch, so there’s never a dull moment. (more…)
Technorati tags: chokingonpopcorn movie Reviews The Goonies
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
Saturday, December 1st, 2007
Michael Moore is back and this time the American healthcare system gets a beating. Moore takes us on a two-hour journey to illustrate how and why the American healthcare system works as it does and what the consequences of that system are. It’s not surprising to hear that the insurance companies are rich and just want to get richer. It’s not surprising to hear horror stories about some of the 47 million uninsured Americans. It’s not surprising to hear how the pharmaceutical companies and politicians have a strong hold and influence on the healthcare system, guarding their profits. What is shocking to discover is how little chance the 250 million Americans who are insured appear to have of actually getting their medical bills paid for by the insurance companies.
(more…)
Technorati tags: chokingonpopcorn movie Reviews Sicko
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
|
|
|