DGA and AMPTP Reach Tentative Agreement On Terms of New Contract
January 17th, 2008Day 74, revised
January 17th, 2008I had to cancel my Arizona trip, so I’ll be doing van loading tonight, from 5-8 p.m. (Note that you have to be WGA to sign up, since it’s at the headquarters.)
More on the torrents
January 17th, 2008There’s been a lot of feedback and reaction on this site and others about my c’est la vie attitude towards The Nines showing up on BitTorrent. Some felt I was tacitly endorsing piracy (no), while others wondered if I’d feel the same if I had financed the movie, rather than writing and directing it. So I thought I’d address and clarify some of these issues.
I’m not bouncy with joy over my movie getting torrented, but I think it’s a stretch to equate unlawful downloading with traditional theft. As many commenters have pointed out, The Nines isn’t available in any legal form in many countries around the world, nor will it be in any foreseeable time frame. So I have a hard time arguing that a reader in Germany should pay for the movie when there’s no way he could.1
But I’d draw a distinction between an individual downloading an otherwise inaccessible movie and the business of piracy.
I get pissed off when I see blackmarket DVDs sold on the sidewalks of Manhattan, because those are literally discs we’re not selling. It’s organized crime. Even the big torrent sites are essentially profiting off others’ work, by selling ads. So yes, I’m mindful that even as I excuse the individual downloader, the system which allows the individual downloader is far less noble.
The pro-torrent argument, particularly for indie films which get limited distribution (like The Nines), is that a torrent allows a lot of people to see the movie who otherwise couldn’t. And yes, a filmmaker wants his work seen.
But he also wants to be paid for his efforts. No matter where you work — an office, a factory, a retail store — you do your job with the expectation of getting paid. If your employer decided he didn’t want to pay you, you’d be upset. If the employer said, “Well, the customers decided to take the products without paying for them,” you’d rightly tell him to get off his fat ass and hire a security guard.
That’s why I have no problem with Sony and the MPAA going after bootleggers and other merchants of ill-gotten films. It’s not just the studios’ right to see that the law is enforced; it’s their job.
But I’d steer the legal machinery towards stopping the true black market — counterfeit discs and camcorder specials — and spend more time coming up with legitimate, convenient alternatives to the torrents, so that’s it’s not any more difficult to find and download a movie legally.2 Apple’s new rental deal with the studios sounds promising. That and a dozen other efforts could make the market competitive, which will be better for everyone.
On the money
The Nines was independently financed. And while the money came from various sources, it all streamed through me. I signed every check. I own the copyright through Confederated Products LLC, which in turn licenses the movie to distributors like Sony, Newmarket and Optimum.
So when I refer to The Nines as being “my movie,” I’m not just claiming artistic ownership as writer/director. It really is mine. So unlawful downloading has a much more direct effect on me for The Nines than it would for the other movies I’ve written, like Go or Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
One of the things I hope to do with The Nines — sometime after the writers’ strike, when I can call Sony again — is work with them to release a low-res version of all the source material for The Nines, so budding filmmakers can try their hand at cutting (and re-cutting) a real feature. So I’m watching this first wave of torrents carefully, hoping the people who are downloading The Nines are doing it because they love movies, and not because they want to screw over some mythical The Man. Because to a very large degree, I am The Man in this case.
- Several commenters have suggested the “tip jar” model, where motivated viewers could contribute to the filmmaker. I don’t know of any successful examples of this form of micro-patronage, but I’d happily be proven wrong. ↩
- And legally worldwide. Given the dominance of American media, it’s especially frustrating that cinephiles in Australia and other markets have to queue at the back of the line for movies they’ve seen promoted 12 months earlier. ↩
Way to go
January 17th, 2008Models 1’s Sam Way, looking phenomenal with campaigns and editorials galore.

Pols courtesy of Models 1

Delta and The Recording Academy Rock the Skies With In-flight Concert for Lucky Music Fans With Five-Time GRAMMY Winner John Legend
January 17th, 2008Paranoid Park (2007)
January 17th, 2008
Gus van Sant’s 2003’s Elephant added an important flare to the authentic portfolio of the director. Van Sant used local Oregon high school students, thus adding extra realism to his stance on the US high school shootings. Not only was the director able to get amazing natural acting performances from his self-appointed cast, it also made the presence of a political opinon completely unnecesary. Van Sant’s efforts for Elephant seemed a one time experiment, considering the rather lousy Last Days. However, the filmmaker picked up where Elephant left off with his latest endeavour, Paranoid Park. (more…)
Technorati tags: chokingonpopcorn movie Reviews Paranoid Park
Strike, days 73 and 74
January 16th, 2008I was out sick this morning (on the mend, thank you), and will be headed to a conference in Arizona tomorrow. So I’ll have no news from the picket line for the rest of the week. I predict it will be dark and cold, with some good conversation that I’ll sadly miss.
The general consensus is that there will be some kind of DGA deal announced soon. Could it solve the strike? Maybe, if the terms included make meaningful strides in internet residuals. It’s hard for the studios to claim they have no idea how they’ll make money off the internet when all six majors signed on to Apple’s new rental service.
Pakistani Pop Singer Backs Out of Bollywood’s ‘Osama’
January 16th, 2008Filed under: Drama, Foreign Language, Independent, Romance, Celebrities and Controversy, Politics
It's time for yet another story about people taking cinema way too seriously. Fortunately, most stories don't have disastrous results, but sometimes the fiery words lead to a scary reality, like the murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh. Pakistani pop singer Ali Haider isn't willing to take that chance. The BBC reports that he has backed out of the lead role in an upcoming Bollywood film called Osama after being threatened over his potential involvement.Not about the infamous Bin Laden directly, the film will follow a Kashmir boy named Osama who is at the World Trade Center during the 9/11 attacks. Haider says that the film was a love story that he hoped would change the image of Pakistani people: "It was to show the world the other side of the coin. I felt it was my responsibility as a Muslim. But I have to look after a family of which I am the sole bread-winner."
In November, he started getting threats over the phone (up to 10 a day), and said that those dealing the threats knew "everything about my movements; when I am at the jogging track, or when I am in the gym." After the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, he wondered what would happen to someone like him, and pulled out of the role -- a decision he says cost him $160,000. There is no word yet on who will replace him in the film.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Spike Lee Gets Hit with a Belated Lawsuit
January 16th, 2008Filed under: Drama, Independent, Celebrities and Controversy
There's nothing like media lawsuits filed a long time after the fact. Whether the claims are true or not, these people must realize how much the passage of time hurts their case, or at least makes things sound fishy. Nevertheless, The Louisville Courier-Journal reports that a local businessman, writer, and owner of a hip-hop recording business, James Lee White, has filed a law suit against Spike Lee. He claims that the famous director's 2004 film, Sucker Free City, is based on his own 2002 script, Mixed Up. White says that Lee created the film with screenwriter Alex Tse within a few months of the new writer submitting his own script to Lee's production company, 40 Acres and a Mule, in 2002, and that the released version has 85 similarities to White's work.The Louisville businessman claims that he didn't realize that Sucker Free City had, well, made him a sucker (so to speak), until he rented the Showtime pilot last year. The lawsuit alleges that the films are similar in "the arrangement of the scenes, the expression of the scenes, substantially similar core plot foundation, dialog, settings, characters, characters' personalities, and a substantial similar feel, look, and pace."
White says: "I'm a black man, and Spike Lee of 40 Acres and a Mule -- you are a black man. And you stole from a black man and you know it. What do you call that? A hypocrite." That being said, White isn't looking for a big cash cow. He just wants compensation for his script, up to Writers Guild standards, and the opportunity to write more for both Showtime and 40 Acres. I get the Showtime bit, but if Lee stole from him, and is a hypocrite, why would this guy want to work with him in the future? That sort of takes the wind out of his own sails.
[via Film Stew]
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
