Pass the stuffing

November 26th, 2007

Everyone got something to eat at the movies over the Thanksgiving holidays, with five new studio releases combining for a healthy upturn in overall box office grosses. Seriously; you could just about hear the Hollywood execs groaning from the turkey-related tryptomine overdose on the living room couch.

Disney's "Enchanted" was the runaway winner, with $35 million over the weekend and a $50 mill five-day haul. A star got born, too: Amy Adams now sits atop the Internet Movie Database Starmeter.

But "Enchanted" was at 3,700 movie theaters and thus unavoidable; good word of mouth and positive reviews wrapped it up. More interesting is the appearance of buppie holiday comedy-drama "This Christmas" in the No. 2 spot, with $18.6 million over the weekend and $27 mill for the five-day span. At 1,858 theaters, that translates to a $14.5K per-theater-average -- higher than "Enchanted."

Actioner "Hitman" ($21 million), goopy family drama "August Rush" ($13 million), and Stephen King-derived horror film "The Mist" ($13 million) all played well to their respective post-prandial niches. In other words, in the weekend's feast they were the equivalent of the cranberry sauce, squash, and that peas-and-pearl onions dish your aunt makes that nobody eats. Except that this time someone ate it.

For further numbers, check out the Box Office Mojo chart and Leonard Klady at Movie City News.

On The Verge…

November 25th, 2007

Hope you had a pleasant Thanksgiving.

I really really really hope that the Verrones and the Counters and the Youngs and the Chernins and the Bowmans and the Meyers had a pleasant Thanksgiving.

They’re all back in the room tomorrow.

And there are rumors.

Hollywood rumors occasionally come on like seizures, grabbing everyone’s attention and shaking them around. More frequently, they emerge like one of Kant’s synthetic a priori judgments—supposedly unquestionably true, and yet not by way of reason or analysis. People suddenly just know stuff, and they don’t know why, but they sure as hell believe it.

Gotta love this town.

There’s a rumor out there now that Monday’s meeting is almost pro forma. The rumor says that the basic deal structure has been agreed upon, the next few days are about hammering out the devillish details, but whatever that magic number is…it’s been found.

Tempting to believe.

So tempting…that I believe it.

But first, some baseball news.

I was reading about Johan Santana today (for those of you who don’t follow the sport, he’s pretty much the best pitcher in the game…and a lefty to boot). The Twins have him under a cheap contract for one more year.

If they keep him for that year, he becomes a free agent…and leaves them, because they can’t afford to pay him what he’s worth on the open market.

If they trade him now, they lose him for one year but stand to gain some tremendous players in return.

Easy choice. They have to trade him.

Here’s where the game theory kicks in. They can’t trade him for scrubs. They need great players. So it would seem they have all the leverage. On the other hand, the teams they’re dealing with know all too well that the Twins have to trade him, or they end up with nothing…and those teams would then still have a shot at Santana on the open market.

So the Twins need to be strong but reasonable, and the opposing teams need to be strong but reasonable.

Nice balance.

Right now, our situation makes the Santana trade look like child’s play, but still…we have some balance, and that’s what matters. Neither side can crush the other (despite infantile proclamations to the contrary from both the union and the companies). The companies know that their current offer is a non-starter in a general sense. By now, they’ve heard as much, I presume, from the DGA.

Either they dared us to strike to see if we had the balls (dumb, because their deal was so ridiculous, who would possibly agree to take it?), or they forced us to strike in order to….

…well, hell, Nick Counter, buy me a drink one day and explain that to me if it’s the case. It certainly seemed like the AMPTP forced a strike, but to what end?

Regardless, the balance in the equation may be forcing a compromise. We’re costing them money. We’re costing ourselves money. They have the DGA they can bargain with…but they still have to bargain with them.

If the rumors are correct, there’s enough impetus to get the AMPTP back to finding the magic number.

So let’s start defining “victory.”

To me, victory doesn’t have to include any DVD increase (and given that we already gave that one up before ungiving it up, don’t expect it folks…and yes, I’ve spoken with a number of writers who honestly believe that we’ll get one). It doesn’t have to include any jurisdictional gains, nor does it have to include anything at all regarding product integration.

Victory requires the following.

  1. Maintenance, at very least, of status quo for separated rights
  2. A better-than-DVD rate for electronic sell-through on the internet
  3. A reasonable formula for streaming reuse

Pretty muddy, I grant you. For instance, what if the companies promise a good residual rate, but insist on that rollback for separated stage dramatization rights? I’ll let other people chew on those. Similarly, what’s reasonable for #3? And how much better than is truly better than? .31% ain’t enough. 2.5% won’t happen either.

Perhaps, if the rumors are correct, those are the things left to discuss. They’re big things.

But if we’ve gotten past some of the major stumbling blocks and boiled it down to the serious stuff at hand…and more importantly, if the AMPTP is ready to acknowledge certain basic realities…then we might be back to work soon.

Before I go, there are two other matters to discuss.

First, attorney Jonathan Handel has written a fantastic primer on our residuals rates and the true numbers involved. Surprise, surprise…the whole “four more cents!” thing is reductive sloganeering with little bearing on the actual economic issues here…and yet…as Handel argues convincingly, we deserve more nonetheless.

I strongly recommend you read his essay. You can’t fit it on a picket sign, but it’s a whole lot more convincing than anything beginning with “Hey hey, ho ho!”

Secondly, I’ve received a number of emails all posing variants of the following question.

“I’m not a member of the WGA yet, and I’m wondering how the strike affects me. Can I sell material to or work for signatory companies? Is there any rule preventing me from doing that?”

Here’s my answer to all of you who’ve asked.

I’m not telling you.

I’m not telling you because I’m basically here to try and help writers and empower writers, and while I love truth and accuracy, I’m not obligated to write down how-to manuals for scabbing.

So here’s the answer I’ll give instead.

Regardless of the rules, regulations, laws, court decisions and anything else prevailing either for or against you, if you sell material to or make writing deals with signatory companies while the WGA is on strike, then you’re an asshole.

You’re an asshole because you’re undercutting, you’re an asshole because you’re exploiting opportunities made possible by people who are trying to better everyone’s circumstances, and you’re an asshole because…well…

…I’ll go back to a synthetic a priori judgment. You just are.

Good enough for Kant, good enough for me.

Aggh, one more thing (“Our three weapons are…!”).

The blog.

Totally redoing it. I’ve decided that MovableType 4, while better than 3, is still inferior to WordPress. So I’m switching over to WordPress, and I’m redesiging the look of the whole thing while I’m at it.

Hopefully it will be done before the end of the year.

Some good news…commenting will be much more user-friendly. Specifically, you’ll be able to live preview your comments as you type them, and you’ll also be able to EDIT them (cue the angelic chorus) for 15 minutes following the initial submission.

I’m going to try and make the whole site feel cleaner and simpler, with a few Web 2.0 perks thrown in (like super-easy icons to refer articles to social bookmarking sites like Digg and Reddit).

Alas, I think the quill is going bye-bye. I liked it, it served us well, but progress demands that we pave that sucker over and build something new. Hopefully you’ll enjoy it.

One more Dylan-related item…

November 21st, 2007

dontlook.jpg

"Don't Look Back," D.A. Pennebaker's monumental 1967 documentary about Zimmy's 1965 tour, just became available on iTunes for $10. Sounds like a deal to me. See where Haynes swipes the visual cliches for the Blanchett sequences. See Bob humiliate Donovan and everyone else within earshot. Wonder at how someone so malicious can be so ungodly attractive.

Ty’s movie picks for Turkey Weekend

November 21st, 2007

eddie%20coyle.jpg

The movies bumrush the theaters today instead of Friday, the better to make money when we just can't stand being in the house with our relatives anymore. (Although if you're feeling masochistic and want to watch other familes make each other miserable, by all means toddle off to see either "This Christmas" or Noah Baumbach's "Margot at the Wedding." In the latter, Nicole Kidman is so brilliantly horrific that she'll make that dysfunctional second cousin of yours look like a pillar of sanity.)

The weekend box office success will probably be "Enchanted," the Disney animation/real-life comedy-drama that even the critics seem to love. (I haven't seen it yet, but I'll be taking the girls this weekend.) Wesley says that Amy Adams emerges a star. I say it's about time.

The artistic success is easily "I'm Not There," Todd Haynes' megalicious deconstruction/celebration of the man who says he's Bob Dylan (yeah, but which one?). I got 1,200 words out this movie in the paper and could have gone on for 2,000 more, because this dense, funny, wise, exasperating movie is the gift that keeps on giving. I could have pointed out the drive-by tribute to Godard's "Masculin Feminin" when the onscreen Dylan goes to the movies and thinks "It wasn't the film we had dreamed, the film we all carried in our hearts, the film we wanted to make... and secretly wanted to live." I could have wondered where all the other Dylans were: mid-80s Rabbi Dylan (played by Sandler, perhaps), aging lounge lizard Dylan (Wayne Newton), the Jesus-Dylan who turns up at the end of "The Last Waltz." I could have pointed out where Haynes misses the boat entirely (Blanchett's Jude sneers at a socialite: "Just like a woman" -- Oy vey.) Or how Blanchett manages to seem exactly like 1965-era Bob even with a voice an octave higher. Or how Christian Bale sings "Pressing On" so well in the born-again sequence that you'd hardly know he's lip-syncing John Doe.

Lots of stuff. By the way, every time I mention this movie, Wesley rolls his eyes and changes the subject. Maybe it's a boomer thing. Hopefully he'll weigh in here on why the movie leaves him cold.

Big horror movie from Stephen King and Frank Darabont, "The Mist." No, it's not a remake of "The Fog". For one thing, the ending's a lot worse. I give it away in the review, so tread carefully. Excellent severed-torso and death-by-giant-mosquito effects, though.

"Hitman" and "August Rush" only if you have a craving for turkey.

By the way, if you're really hard up on Thanksgiving (or tonight), the Brattle is showing the 1973 Robert Mitchum classic "The Friends of Eddie Coyle." Forget about "Mystic River," "Gone Baby Gone," and "The Depahted" -- this is the great Boston movie. It's even based on a George V. Higgins novel.

Go easy on the gravy, folks.

Oscar documentary and animation contenders announced

November 20th, 2007

persepolis2.jpg

Thanks to GreenCine Daily for alerting me to the fact that the good folks at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences have announced their list of fifteen eligible feature documentaries for the 2007 Doc Oscar, chosen from an original list of 70 films. They are:

?Autism: The Musical?
?Body of War?
?For the Bible Tells Me So? (Ty's review)
?Lake of Fire?
?Nanking?
?No End in Sight? (Wesley's review)
?Operation Homecoming: Writing the Wartime Experience? (Janice Page's review)
?Please Vote for Me?
?The Price of Sugar? (Wesley's review)
?A Promise to the Dead: The Exile Journey of Ariel Dorfman?
?The Rape of Europa? (Mark Feeney's review)
?Sicko? (Ty's review)
?Taxi to the Dark Side?
?War/Dance?
?White Light/Black Rain?

It's a war-obsessed list, in terms of both history and current events, whch is fine. Tony Kaye's hellacious abortion doc "Lake of Fire" may be the most audacious of the bunch, but it may scare some off. "Sicko"? Pfff, the bloom is off Michael Moore's rose, at least as Hollywood's concerned. My way-too-early guess is that either "Nanking" or "No End in Sight" will go the distance.

A few days back, AMPAS also announced a list of the 12 animated films that will be eligible in the Best Animated Feature category. It's much more depressing. (Links are to Globe reviews, where available.)

?Alvin and the Chipmunks?
?Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters?
?Bee Movie?
?Beowulf?
?Meet the Robinsons?
?Persepolis? (image, above)
?Ratatouille?
?Shrek the Third?
?The Simpsons Movie?
?Surf?s Up?
?Tekkonkinkreet? (Say what? It's an anime. Here's the IMDb link.)
?TMNT?

*Sigh* With luck, the classy craft of "Ratatouille" or the witty, low-res storytelling of "Persepolis" will sneak into the final five. At least half of this stuff is crap, though.

Have You Emailed Me?

November 19th, 2007

Then I’m sorry…and thank you.

I’ve been deluged lately, and with the last few days of production still left to go, I just haven’t had a chance to respond to everyone the way I normally do.

I’ve gotten a ton of email in the past week or so, all of it very kind and supportive, and I thank each of you for taking the time. I feel like a jerk for not responding individually, and once I get my life back, I promise to get better about that.

If you sent me a link to a blog article, MSM article or YouTube video, I also thank you. I’m trying to read and watch everything when I get a chance.

More to come in a few days. I’m trying to get the Guild to clarify their position on location striking, which is a hot topic among my writer friends (and the source of some confusion and disparate understandings). No answer yet. Hope to hear back soon.

I’ll leave you with this. Got sent the link by Ask A Ninja, which is one of the few actual, honest-to-goodness funny websites out there.

I want to be part of the Dragon Claw Fire Horde.

Ghostbusters 3: The Game

November 19th, 2007

Stupendous news has reached my ability to comprehend awesomeness; Ghostbusters 3 is happening at last, with Dan Ackroyd and Harold Ramis producing and featuring the voices of all the original Ghostbusters. But rather than coming to a screen near you, the jump-suited New Yorkers will be arriving at a living room near you… Or, indeed, in your living room. Or wherever you keep your Xbox 360/Playstation 3, for the next Ghostbuster outing will be a videogame.

Ghostbusters 3 is being produced by Vivendi Games and the story is being written by Dan Ackroyd and Harold Ramis. The game will follow on from Ghostbusters 2 and will be set in Manhattan in the early 90s. Bill Murray, Dan Ackroyd, Harold Ramis and Ernie Hudson will all supply voices aswell as William Atherton, Brian Doyle Murray and Annie Potts. No word on Rick Moranis’ voice yet, but he is featured in the demo footage below.

Variety are reporting that developer Terminal Reality is making a “Ghostbusters” game for PC, Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 aimed primarily at the core gamer demographic, while Red Fly Studio is making a version for Playstation 2, Wii and DS designed more for families and casual gamers.

Check out the footage and screenshots below, courtesy of /Film. The game, quite simply, looks stunning and with the creative tour de force of Ackroyd and Ramis behind it, they’ll just have to get the gameplay right and we’ll be looking at one incredible gaming experience.

Demo Footage

Cloverfield – Trailer

November 19th, 2007
  Cloverfield - Trailer
No synopsis provided by the studio.
Directed by: Matt Reeves
Starring: Anamaria Marinca, Laura Vasiliu, Vlad Ivanov, Alex Potocean

London to Brighton (2006)

November 18th, 2007

London to BrightonAll I knew to expect from this film was nitty-gritty British realism. I didn’t even know what the story line was, but from the first scene I was gripped - and for much of the time, tense and upset. Director Paul Andrew Williams throws us headfirst into a chaotic and panicky scene in which prostitute Kelly (Lorraine Stanley) hides the petrified 12-year-old Joanne (Georgia Groome) in a public toilet somewhere in London, while she goes out to earn them some money so they can get out of the city. Despite sporting a fresh black-eye, Kelly manages to make some money at King’s Cross and returns with enough cash for them to take a train to Brighton.
(more…)

Technorati tags:

Signal And Noise

November 17th, 2007

As you can see, we’re still working on getting our formatting back, but in the meantime, I thought I’d catch up with all of you.

It used to be that folks would come here to catch up, I suppose, but you’re all ahead of me now. I go off and work a few 15 hour days in a row, and before I know it, everyone’s on top of everything.

You’ve read all the letters from Verrone, you know the WGA and AMPTP are back at the table on Monday, you followed the tit-for-tat wars between Tommy Short and Verrone (and between Ellen, AFTRA and couldn’t-get-anything-right-if-her-life-depended-on-it Mona Mangan), you know that Carlton Cuse is returning to work on the very same day…

So, what’s it all mean?

There’s an enormous amount of noise out there, literally and figuratively. Picking through it to get the signal is the tricky part.

For instance, the AMPTP runs an ad proclaiming that they are, in fact, paying us for internet downloads.

Noise.

Signal? They’re paying us at a rate we don’t accept and have explicitly rejected as insufficient, and there’s an entire category of internet exhibition (advertising-supporting streaming) they don’t want to pay us for at all.

Meanwhile, Patric Verrone tells a crowd that we’re “kicking corporate ass” while David Young muses openly to the press about “all the havoc” he’s wreaked.

Noise.

Signal? The Big Five congloms’ asses are still quite unkicked, and David Young needs to start talking publicly like the responsible, pragmatic guy into whom a lot of insiders are telling me he’s blossomed.

Tommy Short, the autocratic head of IATSE, complains that Patric is strike-happy and needs to grow the hell up before more IA members lose their jobs.

Noise.

Signal? Yes, when writers strike, bad things happen. Duh. Production slowing down is obviously one of them. I’m pretty sure that if IATSE ever struck (which will happen in, oh, about a month after never), then writers would suffer too, as development would slow, production payments would cease, and showrunners would go dark. Putting aside whether or not Patrick is strike-happy, it’s absurdly unfair of Tommy to insist that the WGA shouldn’t strike for fear of hurting IA members. This is the guy who hung a rollback around the necks of the Teamsters. It’s his favorite move. He’s a blame shifter.

Speaking of the Teamsters, their decision to encourage their members to individually decide not to cross the picket lines has given our strike a major boost.

Sadly, noise.

Signal? I’ve been talking to some captains, a lot of picketers, a bunch of guys in Local 399 and some people on the inside at the WGA. The Teamsters have been crossing, and I haven’t heard about any shows, lots or production companies negatively impacted in any serious way by Teamster support. I can’t blame the Teamsters here. They’re working men and women under contract, and while the announcement of support from 399’s leadership was a great PR coup (I sure fell for it), PR doesn’t put food on the table. The drivers keep on driving.

Then there’s the issue of the showrunners. They banded together and most of them walked off their writing jobs and their producing jobs (which generally pay them the bulk of their income). Their resistance would lead to a short strike.

Noise.

Signal? They have to go back to work. They have to. The fact that they did what they did was individually brave and commendable, but collectively, it was a high risk/low gain strategy. Shutting down post earlier than normal maybe stole back a few more weeks of episodes than a simple cessation of writing would have, but ultimately, they can’t all end up in breach. Furthermore, whenever we can mitigate collateral damage to other working people (particularly unionized ones like crew), we ought to. I’m happy that Cuse is going back to work, and I’ve spoken with a showrunner who believes quite a few more will return now that negotiations seem to be percolating again.

Speaking of which…

Let’s see. Depending on which strain of rabies you have, this next round of negotiations is either:

a) evidence that our strike has dealt a terrible blow to the companies

or

b) a trap in which the all-powerful AMPTP crushes the rebellion and blows the bejeezus out of Yavin IV.

But you know me…

…I’ll go with neither.

There’s a decent probability that some vague structure of a deal already exists. It may be emerging from back-channels between WGA moderates and AMPTP moderates, or it may be forming out of discussions between the DGA and the AMPTP.

But is it a good structure?

Can either side afford a compromise at this point?

Sure. Both sides have to be aware of the truth of their leverage. Ignore the chanting and the ranting from the rabid extremes on both sides, focus on the inevitable compromises both sides must make, and we could have a deal in hand before Christmas.