 |
June 12th, 2007
Dave Corkery
When Steven Soderbergh announced that he was making a second sequel to Ocean’s 11, film-fans everywhere gave each other confused looks. Why was this great director further burying himself under the dirt of sequel-crud? Wasn’t one unnecessary, superflop sequel enough for the superstar cast and director? But no, they just couldn’t get enough of each other and now here we are with Ocean’s 13. But luckily for them, it’s a return to form for Steve and the crew.
Posted in CinemATTIC, Reviews | No Comments »
June 12th, 2007
Filed under: Horror, Thrillers, Lionsgate Films, Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Movie Marketing, Interviews 
Earlier this afternoon I had a chance to speak with Courtney Solomon from After Dark Films. A filmmaker himself (he directed An American Haunting and the 2000 flick Dungeons & Dragons), Courtney is now a partner over at After Dark Films. A company that has a multi-picture deal with Lionsgate; these are the same folks who were also responsible for marketing the upcoming horror flick Captivity. And we all know what happened there. Back in March, a bunch of controversial billboards for Captivity began popping up all over New York and Los Angeles; billboards, mind you, that were not approved by the MPAA. Hence, the MPAA suspended the film's ratings process and slapped After Dark Films with an unprecedented sanction, forcing the company to clear all venues and locations of its ad buys with the MPAA.
Since then, the film's release date has been pushed back twice (it's now set to be released on July 13), and folks like Eli Roth have called them out basically saying that After Dark Films helped ruin the ratings process for other films, like Hostel: Part II, that were trying to go through the process at the exact same time. Following my interview with Roth (in which the director had some pretty harsh things to say about both Captivity and After Dark), I caught up with Solomon who wanted to set the record straight.
Cinematical: Let me read what Eli Roth said to me regarding Captivity and its controversial ad campaign: "Well ... I mean, everyone hates those guys. And word of mouth is that Captivity sucked. Why would I be jealous of that; I don't give a sh*t. I was pissed actually, because it makes it very difficult for the rest of us. They did not go before the MPAA with those posters. It really puts everyone on edge when that happens. And suddenly, who's the next one up? Oh, thanks, it's me. I'm not doing this for attention, I'm doing this to make good movies. And that decapitated head poster was a European poster; that was in 80% of the countries in Europe. It was not a poster that was intended for American audiences." What's your response to that?
Courtney Solomon: First of all, I've heard this over and over again -- [Eli] has spent most of his publicity tour talking about the Captivity posters and dissing us. I was listening to K-Rock one day, and he spent twenty minutes on there just going on about me -- and I've never even met Eli. As far as what he's saying, there are a couple of things that are completely inaccurate. First of all, nobody has seen Captivity because we re-did a third of the movie and we're just finishing it now. We actually just finished the mix on it two days ago. So he hears word around town that the movie is sh*t, but how can he say that when no one has even seen the movie? We just spent a lot of money and a lot of time to make the movie better, because we cared that the movie was good. In fact, it's got a lot more substance than his movie does -- that's number one. That's just a blatant, stupid, wrong statement. That's someone just spouting out from the mouth without even thinking about what they're saying. Continue reading Interview: After Dark Films' Courtney Solomon Talks to Cinematical About 'Captivity' Controversy and Eli Roth's Big ... Mouth Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, cinematical, Movie News | No Comments »
June 12th, 2007

The flamboyant C3PO and R2D2 both appear in this '80s anti-smoking PSA. Runtime: 36 sec
Posted in Commercials | No Comments »
June 12th, 2007

Kelly Clarkson tries to charm a cobra on a Danish talkshow. Runtime: 30 sec
Posted in Commercials | No Comments »
June 12th, 2007
One of the few motion graphics companies that have come up with a style so potent that they’ve been able to carry it across the majority of their projects is Zeitguised.

Their work often involves twisted structures frenetically morphing into one another that they refer to as “high gloss artschool 3D punk blends”. They’ve been off the radar for some time now, but its obvious that they’ve been continuing to push their technique further and further. Their newest music video “Junior Boys In the Morning” (both a departure and a progression from their previous work) is the present state of the evolution of this style.
Posted in Filmmaking | No Comments »
June 12th, 2007

Mr. T saves the I.T. world from corporate zombies, a cold-hearted consultant, and dumb disk arrays! Runtime: 3 min 23 sec
Posted in Commercials | No Comments »
June 12th, 2007

The great Senegalese filmmaker -- the first and most important cinematic voice to emerge from post-Colonial Africa -- is dead at the age of 84. A.O. Scott's Times obit ran yesterday, as did the A.P. obituary, and Scott's further appreciation is in today's Times. Wesley's overview of Sembene's career will be in tomorrow's Globe (I'll retrolink when it goes up). Here's a good webpage for beginners, and there's always Wikipedia.

Sembene started making movies later than other post-WWII giants like Truffaut, Fellini, Kurosawa, but you could argue that he's more important than all of them put together, because there simply wasn't an African cinema before him. With 1966's "Black Girl" and especially 1968's "Mandabi" ("The Money Order"), he applied a social realist narrative style to narrative concerns directly impacting Senegalese and African audiences: racism, post-colonial corruption, women's rights, the search for a cultural identity untainted by Western values.
Which makes his movies sound like medicine, when they're anything but. Rather, they're alive and bursting with characters, some humorous, some tragic, all striving to be heard. Sembene's last film, "Moolaade," is about women in a rural village who resist the tradition of female circumcision, but a wiser, more joyous, yet more unsettling depiction of the push and pull of human life you will not find.
Not many of Sembene's films made it to American theaters, and they're hard to find on video (the riotous 1975 bourgeoise satire "Xala" is available, as are "Mandabi" and "Black Girl" -- all highly recommended. "Moolaade" has been on DVD but is currently unavailable; look for used copies). For that reason, he's not as well known as he should be in the West. That didn't seem to bother the filmmaker, whose use of local dialects and oral tradition was meant to reach as many of his countrymen and fellow Africans as possible. "Africa is my 'audience,'" he once said, "while the West and the 'rest' are only targeted as 'markets'.
So he didn't need us. But we need his movies.
Posted in Movie News | No Comments »
June 12th, 2007
When you were directing The Nines, did you find that you wanted to change some of the action and dialogue because it didn’t come across in production the way you thought it would when you wrote it. And, if you changed things, was it because you were maybe hypercritical of your own work and saw problems where nobody else would or did you consider making changes just because you could (being the writer and everything)?
– Dennis Feeney
The action changed somewhat, based on the geography at hand. For instance, there’s a scene in Part Three where a family is coming back to a parked car. As scripted, there was a certain sequence for who would be where for what line of dialogue, but once you have real actors, real dolly movements and real reflections to contend with, that all changes. And that’s after storyboarding, during which some of those things were already decided.
In terms of dialogue, I didn’t find myself changing that many lines. We’d had the luxury of some rehearsal, so if there was a line that an actor really had a difficult time landing, I could change that ahead of time.
Once we started production, I really saw myself as a the director, not the writer. If something wasn’t working, my instinct was to look at changes in the performances or the camera movement rather than the words. Indeed, the few times I did go back in to writer-mode was when I saw unanticipated opportunities. During a confrontation between Hope Davis and Melissa McCarthy, I added this line…
- SARAH
- He’s an actor. If no one’s watching him, he doesn’t really exist.
…which ends up being fairly important to the scene (and, ultimately, the movie). Yet I added it at six in the morning on the day of shooting, based largely on something I overheard the actors talking about between takes. That kind of serendipity is what made my dual roles rewarding.
Posted in Screenwriting, Words on the page | No Comments »
June 12th, 2007
XYZ and Bitstate (both on The Ebeling Group’s roster) have created two more spots for the Havaiana’s campaign. (We posted the Three Legged Legs addition a while back).

Watch XYZ’s spot | Watch Bitstate’s spot
All the spots in the campaign use electric, candy-coated palettes to paint dreamlike worlds that we tour from a foot’s point of view. It’s a fun concept, albeit a little constraining at times. I think it works, though, especially with the sudden jumps to live action (a.k.a. “reality”) at the end of each spot.
Posted in Filmmaking | No Comments »
June 12th, 2007
Rolling an impossible thirteen with two dice already on the table, Ocean’s Thirteen, Steven Soderbergh’s practically critic-proof third entry into the Ocean’s canon of heist movies marks a return to both the form of the original film and its Las Vegas setting.
The sequel, Ocean’s Twelve, sprawled in terms of narrative and location and felt diluted and lacking because of it. In the one true City of Sin it’s effortless; each member of this eclectic team of thieves distinguishing himself wonderfully, especially the talented Affleck whose comfortable, playful banter with Caan is like sparring sessions ahead of the main event: Clooney and Pitt.
Say what you want about these two, they’re practically Hollywood gentry. They’re stylish; they lounge like the most consummate lizards. When they’re on-screen it feels like you’re watching rehearsals, never sure which lines are improvised. We don’t flow into their scenes; we break in, the punch line to some fabulous joke just delivered; the opening frustratingly out of reach. What seems extraneous is actually the main pleasure of the film. It’s narrative as play, and all the more pleasingly audacious for it, making plot twists or surprises as inconsequential as the dust flicked from a swinger’s lapel.
It’s ephemeral, a taste of the fun these actors must be having behind the scenes, but we’re not talking base MTV reality here, this is drunken nostalgia for the old players of Vegas. As the leads emulate Sinatra and Martin like never before, they, along with the double-crossed Reuben, the catalyst of the plot, represent the old moral code of Vegas, facing down the perversion of Vegas’s fine history by the vulgar Willie Banks and his prestige without style industry. It’s almost ironic that the usually boorish Pacino pulls off an almost subdued turn as the aforementioned Banks.
It’s touches like this that belie the sly undercurrent to the film as Soderbergh reminds us why he can be such a deft director. Intertwined with the raucous narrative is a scathing look at the distribution of wealth, as dice are manufactured for nothing by oppressed Mexicans and rolled on Banks’ crap tables for everything. Masking a message that money is both power and poison with comedy.
And it’s not just in narrative and theme that Soderbergh shines. Through a clever use of montage, split screen, and floating camera that flits on the edges of the action, he creates an intoxicating pulse, almost funk rhythm that melds perfectly with the tonal shifts of colour, moving from subtle, almost chilly hues of blue and grey to the rich reds, and golds of the strip. It’s aesthetic as play, and it’s this approach, taking his arty, loose filmmaking style and blending it with the warmth of mass entertainment that makes this film such an audacious hit.
However, as Willie Banks might say: tread carefully Mr. Ocean, audacity can only take you so far. Coast on that alone and I can assure you there’s a fair few million who won’t be betting on you next go around.
Been writing film criticism since I had eyes to see and a mind to nitpick with. Favourite genre being the Western. Had reviews posted on websites like www.aintitcool.com and the UK broadsheet The Independent.


Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie Reviews, Video | No Comments »
|
|
|