 |
Archive for the ‘Celebrity Gossip’ Category
Monday, April 30th, 2007
Filed under: Drama, Foreign Language, Independent, Celebrities and Controversy, Politics, Cinematical Indie  Through varying periods of the 70's, 80's and 90's, Giulio Andreotti was the Prime Minister of Italy. That recognition came with a large boat of scandal and accusations. He used the Mafia to further his political career, and possibly be a member himself, but he slipped through that accusation due to statutory limitations. The man was also convicted in 2002 of ordering that journalist Mino Pecorelli be murdered -- the man had published allegations about his Mafia ties. However, the next year the appeals court overturned this decision. To top that off, rumors say that Don LIcio Lucchesi in The Godfather Part III is based on him. So, obviously, this could make for a tasty biopic. Well, it could if Andreotti could remember that it exists. Director Paolo Sorrentino said recently that he was going to make a film about the ex-PM, that he had met with Andreotti twice. Last Friday, however, Andreotti refuted the claims: "I don't know anything about this, and I've never met this person. If I had, I would have helped him to understand his subject better. But I hope he doesn't make this film because that's what they do at the end of someone's life, and I have a ways to go." Was Sorrentino lying? The director responded to Andreotti's response, saying: "It's hard to believe the senator's words... maybe his memory is failing him." Is Sorrentino lying? Did Andreotti have a change of heart and decide to feign innocence? Or, does he need to look into memory problems? If it's the latter, Sorrentino might want to hurry up before the ex-PM forgets more! Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, cinematical, Movie News | No Comments »
Saturday, April 28th, 2007
If all goes as planned Saturday, the cremated remains of the actor who portrayed “Scotty” aboard Star Trek’s starship Enterprise will sail into suborbital space aboard a rocket launched from the southern New Mexico desert. Actor James Doohan‘s remains, along with those of Apollo 7 astronaut Gordon Cooper and about 200 others, are aboard the second private rocket scheduled to be launched at Spaceport America, a commercial spaceport being developed in Upham, N.M.
UP Aerospace Inc. of Farmington, Conn., launched the first rocket from the desert site in September. But that Spaceloft XL rocket crashed into the rugged desert after spiraling out of control about nine seconds after liftoff.
Company officials blamed the failure on a faulty fin design. A Spaceloft SL-2 rocket, with a fourth fin added for stability, will carry the cremains, which were loaded into the rocket last month.
Family members paid $495 to place a few grams of their relatives’ ashes on the rocket. Celestis, a Texas company, contracted with UP to send the cremated remains into space.
Charles Chafer, chief executive of Celestis, said last month that a CD with more than 11,000 condolences and fan notes was placed on the rocket with Doohan’s cremains.
Doohan died in July 2005, at age 85. The remains of Gene Roddenberry, who created “Star Trek,” were sent into space in 1997.
Saturday’s launch from the fledgling spaceport currently a 100-foot by 25-foot concrete slab in a patch of desert more than 50 miles north of Las Cruces continues to keep the New Mexico project ahead of its nearest competitor in the West Texas desert.
Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon.com, is said to be developing a spaceport north of Van Horn, Texas. Bezos’ Blue Origin is working to develop manned spaceflight for space tourists.
British billionaire Richard Branson also has announced plans to launch a space tourism company, which is expected to have its headquarters at the New Mexico spaceport.
Posted in Celebrity Gossip | No Comments »
Saturday, April 28th, 2007
From Reuters
In Hollywood, where hype so often seems to be the norm, pro wrestler “Stone Cold” Steve Austin‘s frank assessment of his own performance in his debut movie is, if nothing else, refreshing.
“I didn’t stink the place up,” Austin told Reuters about his role in his new big-screen action adventure “The Condemned,” which opened on Friday. “I think I have a feel for it, and I think I have some ability.”
Austin, 42, has built a global fan base on the back of his brawling, obscenity-laced, bad-boy image in the ring. But about three years ago, he packed his bags and moved to Los Angeles from his home in Texas.
He followed the likes of Hulk Hogan and The Rock, two other big-name grapplers who parlayed their charismatic wrestling personas into movie acting. In “The Condemned,” Austin portrays a character who uses his fists to do his talking.
“It wasn’t a stretch because it’s closer to my regular persona,” he said. “As long as I’ve been in the WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment), my fans have only seen me as Stone Cold Steve Austin.
“I’m glad people will get a chance to see I can be a lot more than someone who uses a lot of four-letter words, drinks a lot of beer, flips people off and beats people up,” he added.
His fans will be relieved to know he still kicks a lot of butt. But like many a good, tight-lipped action hero before him — Stone Cold Steve said that as a boy he admired the likes of John Wayne and Charles Bronson — his character, Jack Conrad, is really a good guy caught in a bad situation.
REALITY TV ‘RAMBO’
Plucked from a Latin American jail where he was wrongly imprisoned for murder, Conrad is dropped with nine other convicted murderers on a remote island where they must battle each other to the death.
An unscrupulous television executive has rigged the island with hundreds of cameras to videotape the killings, and he and his crew are streaming the battle royal on the Internet.
In Hollywood, where movie executives often hawk their ideas as a blend of previous movies or television shows, “The Condemned” could be seen as a combination of “Rambo” and reality TV’s “Survivor.”
Austin, who is 6 feet 2 inches tall and weighs 250 pounds (113 kg), played college football in Texas and afterward worked as a manual laborer. That changed when he started watching pro wrestlers and decided, “I can do that.”
So he began a roughly 15-year career that vaulted him to professional wrestling’s championship level. Now, looking for a less physically demanding way to make a living, he said becoming a movie action hero was another “natural step.”
Hollywood critics have often wondered whether gun-toting screen heroes encourage real-life violence in society, a question that seems even more relevant in the wake of the recent deadly shooting rampage at Virginia Tech University.
Austin said “Condemned” was filmed well before the college massacre, and the movie’s R-rating bars anyone under age 17 from seeing it without an accompanying adult in the United States.
His fans want to see hard-core action, and he is going to work to please them, he said, adding that in the end the movie offers a message about the destructive nature of greed.
Austin said “Condemned” is the first film of a three-picture deal, and he expects more to come.
“I want to make 50 more movies,” the plain-spoken Texan said. “But I’ve got to have good results at the box office.”
Posted in Celebrity Gossip | No Comments »
Thursday, April 26th, 2007
Filed under: Comedy, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, RumorMonger, Celebrities and Controversy  Here's a little controversy and rumor reaction for your Thursday:
- I recently posted about Richard Gere inspiring burning effigies in India when he dipped and kissed Bollywood star Shilpa Shetty while promoting AIDS awareness. Now Guardian Unlimited reports that an Indian judge has issued arrest warrants for the actors, citing the country's public obscenity laws. Considering the fact that the UN AIDS agency says that India has the largest number of HIV/AIDS cases (5.7 million), perhaps it's time to focus on education, and not putting an actor up for a possible three months in prison, and/or a fine, for a cheek kiss. If the matter is not resolved, this could interfere with Gere's causes -- he has often visited Tibetan exiles in Dharmsala to offer support.
- If there is any truth to the rumor that Kate Beckinsale could be the next Barbarella, I bet she will be cast. According to IGN, they've talked with the actress, who has confirmed that no one has approached her about the film. However, she doesn't seem to be averse to the idea: "It's thrilling! I've never heard anything about it before today." She continued on to joke about a name change: "Beckinsale-arella! It's gotta happen!" With her positive reaction to the idea, we might just have Beck-Barb confirmation in no time.
- Alec Baldwin has been all over the news lately. If you haven't been following -- his ex-marital woes recently fueled him to leave a nasty message for his daughter, calling her a "rude, thoughtless little pig." Now CNN has reported on Baldwin's disdain for his business, which obviously stems from the never-ending custody suit with Kim Basinger over their daughter Ireland. He's tried to get out of his contract for NBC's 30 Rock, which was refused, and in a pre-taped interview for The View, he said: "If I never acted again, I couldn't care less." He continues: "I've had enough of this quite frankly to last me a lifetime, especially in the modern tabloid world." Whether these are words uttered in the heat of his distress, or firm feelings, remains to be seen.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Posted in Celebrity Gossip, cinematical, Movie News | No Comments »
Tuesday, April 24th, 2007
A classic-car broker who swindled actor Nicolas Cage and other clients before he was caught in Spain was sentenced Tuesday to five years in prison and $1.8 million in restitution.
Peter Brotman, 47, of Oaks, sold collectables such as a 1964 Rolls-Royce, a 1988 Aston Martin and a 1954 Jaguar on consignment, then kept the money or used it to pay off earlier debts.
Cage, identified in the 14-count indictment as “N.C.,” lost $300,000 in April 2004 when Brotman didn’t send him the full proceeds from the sale of three Ferraris and a Cobra.
“The guy was extremely knowledgeable in the classic-car industry,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Floyd J. Miller said after the sentencing hearing. “It’s a very insular community of mostly wealthy people. They have these auctions at Pebble Beach, Monte Carlo, other places where the rich and famous meet.”
Brotman also defrauded Willow Grove Bank out of $950,000 they lent him to run his suburban Philadelphia business, Pennsylvania Motor Sports, prosecutors said.
He apologized in court Tuesday to his victims, saying he had made poor decisions, defense lawyer Noah Gorson said.
Gorson argued in court papers that Brotman went to Europe to pursue work so he could repay them. At one point, he pledged the proceeds of a $450 million art deal he hoped to broker, but questions arose about the authenticity of the 93 pieces.
Gorson, in the filings, blamed the financial scam on his client’s “cash-flow problems.”
Brotman, who has been detained, pleaded guilty in January to 14 mail-, wire- and bank-fraud counts.
Posted in Celebrity Gossip | No Comments »
Tuesday, April 24th, 2007
Tuesday April 24 3:33 PM ET
Early reviews are good, advance ticket sales are strong and two weeks before its debut, “Spider-Man 3” is grabbing headlines around the world, but director Sam Raimi is so tired he can’t think of more Spidey movies.
“I’m just exhausted, and I need to get away from it for awhile,” Raimi told Reuters in a recent interview.
The big question for this third film about the superhero with spider-like powers is whether audiences will be tired, too, when “Spidey 3” makes its global debut on May 4.
Later sequels in a series tend to face a rough time at the box office because their makers, stars and audiences are weary of the story.
The first “Batman” raked in $411 million worldwide in 1989, but the fourth, 1997’s “Batman & Robin,” posted a $238 million global haul. One notable exception is the “Lord of the Rings” films, which gained critical success and box office muscle during all three of their outings.
To combat sequel fatigue, Raimi said he infused “Spider-Man 3” with a “brand new energy” to create tension between the three main characters, Spider-Man (Tobey Maguire), his girlfriend Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) and his best friend and sometime adversary Harry Osborn (James Franco).
Spider-Man battles new villains in the Sandman (Thomas Haden Church) and Venom (Topher Grace), and develops a new love interest, Gwen Stacy (Bryce Dallas Howard), who comes between Watson and Spidey’s alter ego, the geeky Peter Parker.
GOOD SPIDEY GONE BAD
One factor that may be as important as any of these new characters is that all-around good guy Parker lets the fame of being Spider-Man go to his head, and he risks losing the love of Watson.
“We were not going to keep remaking the same story — even though there are similar elements to all the ‘Spider-Man’ films — we’re going to continue the growth of this guy as a human being,” said Raimi, who also directed the first two installments.
For now, Raimi’s formula is working. The movie, which cost more than $250 million to make, premiered in Tokyo on April 16, screened in Los Angeles late last week and played in London on Monday. Early reviews are mostly good.
“Arachnophiles everywhere finally have cause to celebrate,” said show business newspaper Hollywood Reporter. In London, The Times said the movie “amounts to a daft, highly polished couple of hours of fantasy fun” and gave it three stars out of five.
Comic book films such as “Spider-Man” have mostly young fans who rarely heed reviews, and the third film seems to be enjoying a great deal of pent-up demand.
Earlier this week, online ticket sellers Movietickets.com and Fandango.com said advance sales were very brisk.
So Raimi should rest easy. All the hype, global premieres, early reviews and ticket sales add up to what looks like success for “Spider-Man 3” — if the movie pirates don’t strike first. Already, pirated DVDs can be bought in Beijing.
A fourth film is in development at Columbia Pictures, and while it may not be directed by Raimi — for now, he’s not saying whether he’ll return — he said he is willing to take a look.
“I think they have talked about that, and I’d love to read what they’re developing,” Raimi said.
Reuters/Nielsen
Posted in Celebrity Gossip | No Comments »
Tuesday, April 24th, 2007
This story is from Reuters. Don’t you love it when people stand their ground. . .
Borrowing a line from “Gone With the Wind,” film critic Roger Ebert is telling the paparazzi to take all the pictures they want when he appears in public after surgery that has left him temporarily disfigured.
“Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn,” Ebert said in a column published on Tuesday in the Chicago Sun-Times.
The Pulitzer Prize winner and co-host of the syndicated television show “Ebert & Roeper” had surgery last year for salivary gland cancer that spread to his lower jaw.
Part of his jawbone was removed, and two replacement operations have failed, he said. He is awaiting a third operation.
Ebert, 64, also had a tracheotomy that left him unable to speak. While he has written some movie reviews during recovery, his TV show has used guest critics.
This week Ebert kicks off his annual Overlooked Film Festival in Urbana, Illinois, south of Chicago. As he has for the last eight years, he will host the event.
He said people had urged him not to attend because the paparazzi would take unflattering photos and gossip columns would dish up mean-spirited comments about him.
“When I turn up in Urbana, I will be wearing a gauze bandage around my neck, and my mouth will be seen to droop. So it goes,” Ebert wrote.
“We spend too much time hiding illness. There is an assumption that I must always look the same. I hope to look better than I look now. But I’m not going to miss my festival,” he added.
Ebert said he now communicates “with written notes and a lot of hand waving and eye-rolling.” If a planned surgery is successful, “my speech will be restored.”
Posted in Celebrity Gossip | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 18th, 2007
Civic Duty is a fairly standard thriller that uses the post-9/11 climate of terror suspicion as the backdrop for the story of one man’s paranoid crisis. The film has a strong cast, and occasionally interesting stylistic choices, but is ultimately held back by the story they’re choosing to tell. There are very few actual events in the film; it’s mainly just a guy watching another guy from his apartment window, and despite some attempts to infuse visual drama, that’s just not going to make a particularly exciting film.
The story revolves around Terry Allen (Peter Krause), a recently fired CPA who becomes suspicious of his newly arrived “Middle Eastern looking” neighbor. This causes major issues with his wife (Kari Matchett), and, driven by a fear-mongering media, eventually gets him involved with the FBI.
Watching the film, I wasn’t particularly liking it. Engaging with the lead character required the viewer to go along with his post-9/11 suspicion of everyone around him, and I wasn’t ready to make that leap. The film is talking about a time that has, to a large extent, passed. George Bush may still claim we’re in imminent danger, but I just don’t think most people feel that way, and the fact that Allen is so fearful makes him seem irrational. There’s some justification for how he feels in the story, but when dealing with an issue like that, the viewer comes in with a lot of outside baggage.
It’s quite possible that another viewer could sympathize with his fear, and understand the conflict he’s going through, but I felt increasingly alienated from him, to the point that I actively disliked the character for most of the film. Now, having a character you dislike as a protagonist is workable, if that character has a high level of charisma. I wouldn’t want to meet Jack Nicholson’s Frank Costello of The Departed in the real world, but he’s fascinating to watch on screen. Terry Allen has no charisma, and he’s actively alienating.
For most of the film, I wasn’t sure if this is what they were going for. He’s in practically every scene, and you would expect him to have the sympathy of the filmmakers. Maybe he does, I can’t say that for sure. But near the end, I found a reading of the film that worked for me. Allen is meant to be America, or at least the Bush government, frightened by this attack, and driven to paranoid violence as a result. It doesn’t matter if the Middle Eastern guy in the next apartment is a terrorist or not, we have to go after him just to be safe. Terry will do anything in the name of ‘national security,’ but in pursuing this violent end, he loses himself. Reading his character arc as a stand-in for American foreign policy after 9/11 makes the film much more effective on a thematic level, and helps to justify his seemingly irrational behavior.
That salvaged the film on an intellectual level, and it’s a complex feat to make a nation’s journey into a personal one, but it still doesn’t make the film work on the whole. There’s a couple of serious issues. The major one is I just don’t like the main character, and I found him horribly misguided in his choices. Stand in for America or not, the film should still work on a character level.
Now, this isn’t Krause’s fault. His work as Nate on Six Feet Under is some of the best acting I’ve ever seen, in any medium. There he was given a morally ambiguous character who, particularly in the last season, was disliked by much of the audience, but even when he did bad things, we could always understand his actions. Here, the writing just doesn’t give enough justification for Allen’s odd behavior. There’s an implication at the end of the film that he has a history of violent behavior, and he also fears that he’s not exciting enough for his wife, but is that really enough to push this guy so far over the edge? It just didn’t work for me.
The issue with a film like this is the character needs to go on a journey. Unfortunately, they chose to take him from boring, everyday life to paranoid psychotic. Depicting boring, everyday life is always a problem, and the film’s opening sequence certainly captures the dull, dreary world of a commute, but that’s not particularly exciting as a viewer. The score throughout is very subdued, and contributes to this sleepy lack of energy. The film is confined almost exclusively to his apartment, and it becomes oppressive after a while. Hitchcock could pull off the confined setting in Rear Window, but it doesn’t work so well here.
The film reminds me a lot of Hard Candy, both in terms of style and subject matter. But, the issues Candy addressed were inherently more interesting, and the stakes higher. This movie takes most of its running time just to get to its core issue. The final sequence is an improvement over the rest, but it’s held back by again being trapped in an uninteresting visual environment.
Visually, the film uses a lot of handheld camera and jump cuts to try to create excitement. Normally, I love these techniques, but you need more interesting sets and music to turn them into fully realized film moments. Look at a show like Battlestar Galactica to see this style used well, where it complements the narrative action. Here, it’s like the filmmakers knew that their sets were boring, and the film wasn’t really visual, so they just did whatever they could with the camera. Do all the tracking shots and dissolves you want, someone looking up stuff on a computer is never going to be particularly exciting.
So, this film didn’t really work for me. I can see what the filmmakers were trying to do, and there are some successful moments, but in execution, it just doesn’t work. I’m not sure when this film was shot, but it definitely comes out of a 2002 or 2003 mentality, and just doesn’t feel as relevant today as it might have then.


Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie Reviews, Video | No Comments »
Tuesday, November 14th, 2006
Lodge Kerrigan’s directorial 1993 debut places the viewer into the mind of a schizophrenic through its brilliant use of sound and imagery, creating a very realistic portrayal. After being released from an institution, Peter Winter returns home to search for his daughter, who was put up for adoption by her grandmother after her mother died. His journey is not without diversion, as he becomes a suspect in a series of child murders. Clean, Shaven plays with the audience’s expectations and prejudices toward those with mental illness.
Rather than the slow realization of the loss of a mind, such as HAL in 2001, Winter is already in the midst of schizophrenia, though he is unaware, which is all the more frightening a reminder of the mind’s fragility. He can’t stand his image and covers all mirrors. He thinks his head contains a radio and his fingernail a transmitter. His attempts to stop them lead to a very memorable and graphic scene.
He is a great character because he is the ultimate unreliable narrator. When things are heard on the soundtrack but unseen on screen, how do we know what is real? A focused look at the techniques used to simulate Winter’s state of mind is examined in the video essay A Subjective Assault: Lodge Kerrigan’s “Clean, Shaven” by critic Michael Atkinson.
It’s amazing what Kerrigan was able to accomplish on a $60,000 budget, shooting over two years and edited over another. The scenes blend together well and the film has great pacing, assisted by its length of 75 minutes. He discusses the film with Steven Soderbergh on the commentary track; they became friends at Sundance in 1994. As a filmmaker, Soderbergh is a great interviewer because his understanding of the job allows him to deconstruct the process and ask probing questions that prod Kerrigan to reveal a great deal he might not have thought of on his own.
They discuss all manner of production, from self-imposed aesthetic rules and influences during pre-production — Kerrigan was watching a lot of Polanski and documentaries about mental illness at the time — to location hunting and working with the cinematographer and editor. Jay Rabinowitz was the latter and has gone on to work with directors Jim Jaramusch and Darren Aronofsky.
The film does have some problems, though. The film isn’t as captivating when Winter isn’t in the scene. There isn’t much to the other characters for the actors to work with. Stylistically, that could work when Winter is an observer in the scene, but it happens throughout the film. The plotline with the police detective is heavy-handed. He inserts himself into the story awkwardly, looking almost as if there were some scenes that would transition him into the story easier were cut.
One great feature that more DVDs will hopefully offer is the film’s soundtrack and selections from the film’s final audio mix, downloadable as MP3 files.
Though it offers more style than substance, Clean, Shaven presents a harrowing character study through a great acting performance by Peter Greene and wise choices by Kerrigan. While its depiction may not be 100% accurate, it is much more believable than something hokey like A Beautiful Mind. It is also a great DVD to learn about filmmaking as the process and results are presented to the viewer.
This writer is a member of The Masked Movie Snobs, a collective that fights a never-ending battle against bad entertainment. El Bicho is an active contributing editor for BC Magazine.


Posted in Celebrity Gossip, Movie Reviews, Video | No Comments »
|
|
|